Record Qwen arithmetic audit
This commit is contained in:
parent
4050afe662
commit
27e0e84fb4
1 changed files with 42 additions and 0 deletions
42
PARITY.md
42
PARITY.md
|
|
@ -73,6 +73,48 @@ Comfy input dtype, full-precision weight construction, SDPA backend selection,
|
|||
and residual/BF16 rounding boundaries. Do not run another full inference merely
|
||||
to rediscover this projection result.
|
||||
|
||||
## Qwen Layer-0 Arithmetic Audit After `4050afe`
|
||||
|
||||
The follow-up statement audit covered every remaining active layer-0 arithmetic
|
||||
boundary outside the already-fixed SDPA wrapper: full-precision NVFP4 dispatch,
|
||||
weight/scales, `pre_quant_scale`, BF16 GEMM, activation layout, Q/K RMSNorm,
|
||||
O projection/residual, post-attention norm, SiLU/gate/up product, down
|
||||
projection, and final residual.
|
||||
|
||||
**Result: no further source-proven active mismatch was found.** For the actual
|
||||
checkpoint, Comfy and direct both use BF16 input, BF16 NVFP4 dequantization,
|
||||
BF16 `F.linear`, no projection biases, identical pre-scale ordering, identical
|
||||
MLP evaluation order, and ordinary BF16 residual additions. Explicit flattening
|
||||
and `.contiguous()` in direct are not a demonstrated numerical difference for
|
||||
the captured contiguous batch-one input.
|
||||
|
||||
Do not modify `nvfp4.py` or Qwen MLP/residual code to chase the remaining
|
||||
layer-0 delta. The next justified work is a bounded component experiment that
|
||||
identifies the actual selected SDPA kernel/GQA fallback and verifies capture
|
||||
consistency; it is not another full denoising or video run.
|
||||
|
||||
### Bounded SDPA/Layer-0 Result
|
||||
|
||||
The bounded replay was completed with the fresh projection-capture tensors.
|
||||
For the reference's 17-token layer-0 attention, both paths have native cuDNN
|
||||
GQA available (`flash=False`, `cudnn=True`, `efficient=False`). Therefore the
|
||||
direct SDPA wrapper takes the same native-GQA branch Comfy takes.
|
||||
|
||||
| Boundary | Mean absolute error | Maximum absolute error |
|
||||
| --- | ---: | ---: |
|
||||
| O-projected attention | `0.000244372` | `0.0161562` |
|
||||
| First residual | `0.00026845` | `0.0213833` |
|
||||
| Post-attention RMSNorm | `3.87714e-05` | `0.000426032` |
|
||||
| MLP output | `0.000674194` | `0.0500984` |
|
||||
| Layer-0 output | `0.000808998` | `0.0526199` |
|
||||
|
||||
This confirms the residual error is already present in the captured projection
|
||||
outputs and is amplified by the MLP. The NVFP4 and MLP code audits found no
|
||||
remaining active source-level branch difference. Further edits to flattening,
|
||||
contiguity, dequantization dtype, `pre_quant_scale`, SiLU ordering, or residual
|
||||
adds would be speculative and are prohibited until a new code-path difference
|
||||
is demonstrated.
|
||||
|
||||
## Current Runtime Scope
|
||||
|
||||
| Component | Implemented | Known limitation |
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue